8 Jul What I noticed first about this book were the people whose endorsements fill the back cover. Ziauddin Sardar’s Reading the Qur’an is a fairly. 14 Feb Ziauddin Sardar’s new book which offers a fresh interpretation of the Qur’an with emphasis on context as well as on plurality and inclusiveness. Ziauddin Sardar. ‘If one could pick just one book to connect the Muslim past with its complex present and future potential, Reading the Qur’an would be that book.

Author: Mazilkree Mern
Country: Niger
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Education
Published (Last): 14 December 2009
Pages: 92
PDF File Size: 7.37 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.18 Mb
ISBN: 782-8-52639-281-2
Downloads: 3425
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tet

As such, the Seerah is an integral part of the Shari’ah of Islamic law. The Nizamiyyah employed regular librarians on its staff who received attractive salaries.

Reading the Qur’an

Erading, we must revive ijtihad as the dynamic principle reading the ziauddin sardar seeking a more humane understanding of our faith. If we say that an Islamic university is a normative institution, we are not saying that it is in any way a biased or prejudiced academy. This is the ultimate difference between the Islamic idea of ilm and the western notion of knowledge.

Submitting ourselves to its wisdom, he insists, “should mean testing and interrogating all our ideas and experiences afresh”. There is no such thing as wardar neutral fact or an unaligned truth.

The first steps in this direction were taken reading the ziauddin sardar Uthman, the third Caliph of Islam, who was aware that the total memorisation of the Qur’an, and its preservation in the hearts and minds of the believers, was one thw of the distributive reading the ziauddin sardar of ilm.

How Do You Know?: Reading Ziauddin Sardar on Islam, Science and Cultural Relations

Al-Amash Abu Muhammad Sulaiman Ibn Reading the ziauddin sardara fiercely independent and witty scholar of tradition was frequently approached to write books.

Review quote ‘This book performs the essential democratic function of suggesting that the Qur’an can and indeed ought to be read intelligently by the ziaudvin Muslims and non-Muslims alike, and effectively debunks the myth that the sacred book of Islam is only accessible through the medium of Arabic No one would claim that saddar Qur’an is an easy text, even in translation.


It is clear that the existing institutional structures, both those which are indigenous to Muslim countries and those which are imported from the reading the ziauddin sardar, do not meet these criteria. Many contemporary studies of the Seerah amount to little rearing than benign apologia written in answer to various orientalist accusations.

About Contact News Giving to the Press.

Reading the Qur’an : Ziauddin Sardar :

The Glorious Qur’an Dr. Thus, we hear from Saad Ibn Jubair d. Sardar discovered the depth of the malaise experienced by Muslim writers and thinkers reading the ziauddin sardar working on his first reading the ziauddin sardar The geographer al-Maqdisi tells us that during the tenth century, the visitors to the central libraries of Basra and Ramhurmuz received financial assistance to do their work.

The Qur’an Arthur J. Besides, if all one needs to do is to relate the story of the Prophet, then why is it necessary for new authors to relate the story over and over again? To give reading the ziauddin sardar institution a structure that can be appreciated in modern terms, we can analyse the contemporary and future needs of the Muslim civilisation into certain familiar categories such as ideational, scientific, technological, informational, organisational, social and cultural.

Thus, to make traditional thought relevant to contemporary and future times, the outreach programme should be structured on a conceptual matrix: Outsourced Empire Andrew Thomson. But independent efforts to establish Islamic institutions of higher learning are also being made, the most noteworthy being the Islamic Institute of Advanced Studies in Washington, D.

They argue that it is the freedom to think beyond the bounds of what they see as divine reading the ziauddin sardar that has led to death, destruction, extremism and holocausts in the modern world. Peace will elude the Muslim world as long as we Muslims continue to perform violence on our own ideas and concepts. However, Haykal is all too willing to concede authority to orientalist scholars and consequently is always forced to justify his arguments in their terms.

Thus, a normative institution, the Islamic university is not only a goal-seeking enterprise, but is in the healthy position of being able to guard, to a certain extent, against the type of fact-finding and problem-solving exercise which could lead to disastrous consequences for people, society and the planet.


Traditionalism and Bucaillism remain, for the most part, the dominant frameworks of thinking about science and Islam reading the ziauddin sardar believing Muslims.

The library was also open to the general public and free writing materials were provided to visitors; those who wished to spend time for study also received lodgings, meals and a stipend. Reading the ziauddin sardar reason is not hard to find. Indigenous knowledge systems is a second thread in Sardar’s early writing. Islam has been permitted to languish as the professional domain of people more familiar with the world of the eleventh century than the twenty-first century we now inhabit.

Sardar also suggested that Muslim states should aim to develop technologies appropriate to local needs and conditions – instead of spending large amounts of money on advanced technologies developed out of western laboratories. Ordinary Muslims around the world who have concerns, questions and considerable moral dilemmas about this current state of affairs must reclaim the basic concepts of Islam and reframe them in a broader context. The times we live in are likely to make the efforts of Sardar, as well as other pluralist voices within Islam such as Tariq Ramadan and AbdolKarim Soroush, both more difficult, but also more urgently needed.

In retrospect, Sardar probably lost more than he gained reading the ziauddin sardar taking on the Traditionalists and the Bucaillists with the vehemence with which he did. There are several reasons, but an important one is that Sardar and his colleagues became distracted by a public reading the ziauddin sardar of ideas with three of the existing and more dominant schools of thought on science and the Muslim world.